Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alberta/Assessment
Wikiproject Alberta
Assesment: Statistics - Work list - Assessment log
Alberta articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | Total | ||
FA | 2 | 10 | 8 | 20 | |||
FL | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | |||
GA | 1 | 5 | 21 | 60 | 87 | ||
B | 4 | 20 | 88 | 168 | 280 | ||
C | 3 | 12 | 106 | 507 | 628 | ||
Start | 11 | 604 | 4,221 | 4,836 | |||
Stub | 191 | 4,349 | 4,540 | ||||
List | 1 | 3 | 62 | 177 | 1 | 244 | |
Category | 1,605 | 1,605 | |||||
Disambig | 52 | 52 | |||||
File | 107 | 107 | |||||
Project | 10 | 10 | |||||
Redirect | 1 | 3,757 | 3,758 | ||||
Template | 1,570 | 1,570 | |||||
Other | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Assessed | 9 | 55 | 1,085 | 9,496 | 7,104 | 17,749 | |
Unassessed | 4 | 4 | |||||
Total | 9 | 55 | 1,085 | 9,496 | 7,108 | 17,753 | |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 54,946 | Ω = 5.29 |
Requested assessments[edit]
- Henry Norwest I expanded the article a fair bit, so I'd appreciate a re-assessment because I do not think that it is a stub anymore. CplKlinger (talk) 02:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Empty table[edit]
Your assessment table looks empty now because the assessment categories have been moved from "X-Class WikiProject Alberta articles" to just "X-Class Alberta articles". The table will fill back up on its own once the job queue and bots catch up to the change. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 19:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)