Talk:Did Six Million Really Die?

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Alternative Views Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Antisemitic? Or not.[edit]

The disambiguation line has stated in the past "This article is about the 1974 antisemitic pamphlet...." Today it has been changed twice by IP-editor/s to "This article is about the 1974 pamphlet...." and subsequently reverted by two different editors (including myself). It seems clear to me that a "Holocaust denial" pamphlet is, ipso facto, by its very existence, anti-semitic. Apparently others disagree - let's discuss and come to a consensus. Shearonink (talk) 01:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's really the same IP editor and if I see it again I'm blocking the range. Anything the National Front publishes about Jews can be assumed to be antisemitic until reliable sources prove otherwise. Any editor trying to imply that a a work on Holocaust denial from the National Front is not antisemitic is not here to build a reality-based encyclopedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Antisemitic" gets the point across. "Historical-denialist" or "Holocaust-denialist" work but both are longer. No change is needed at this time. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rudolf Vrba uttering "licentia poetarum" in a trial[edit]

"Attacked on all sides by Zündel’s lawyer, the impostor had no other recourse than to invoke, in Latin, the “licentia poetarum,” or “poetic license,” in other words, the right to engage in fiction." The Zündel Trials (1985 and 1988) (ihr.org) 76.115.40.93 (talk) 02:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]